Striking Equilibrium in Leadership: a Journey beyond the challenges of servant leadership

Within leadership circles, the notion of servant leadership has achieved substantial recognition, marking a pivotal focus on leaders dedicating themselves to the needs and development of their teams. However, a critical discernment of its potential pitfalls is crucial, particularly for leaders embedded in academia and STEM organizations. Leaders, by understanding and addressing these warnings and fostering a balanced leadership interlacing self-care and personal progression, can optimize their leadership prowess in these dynamic environments. This opinion piece embarks on an exploration of the pertinent cautions surrounding servant leadership and presents practical strategies for leaders seeking to refine their leadership stance.

​Unearthing the Challenges of Servant Leadership:
Digging into the thoughts of eminent thinkers in servant leadership like Larry C. Spears, Robert K. Greenleaf, James Dittmar, and Brene Brown, we uncover crucial insights into potential challenges. Spears (2010) underscores the need for leaders to strike a balance between serving others and achieving organizational goals. Greenleaf (1977) warns against the risk of neglecting one’s own needs when prioritizing the needs of others. Dittmar (2014) explores the various manifestations of servant leadership that may hinder its effectiveness. While Brene Brown’s work doesn’t directly address servant leadership warnings, her expertise on vulnerability and excessive empathy offers valuable considerations within this context.

​​Redefining Self-Balance: A Prerequisite for Effective Leadership:
It’s time to break free from the misconception that pursuing self-balance is self-centered or counterproductive for leaders.
Too often, leaders suppress their own ambitions, personality, and even desires in a well-intended but misguided attempt to embody what they think a leader should be, or what the group needs. Counterintuitively, this selfless approach disconnects them from both their work and the people they lead.  They begin filling a function but not finding fulfilment. Remember, leaders create connection, joy, and balance. You can't give away what you don't have. My cautions against servant leadership do not advocate abandoning the approach altogether.  Rather, I want you to ponder the importance of being a 'whole leader'.  Your health, engagement and growth are part of the commitment to serve others. By embracing this balanced outlook, leaders can sustain their impact over time.
​
Decision-Making and the Essence of Self-Balance:
Servant leaders often face the dilemma of decision-making, prioritizing individual needs over organizational goals. Cultivating self-balance can provide leaders with the capacity to make enlightened decisions that are in sync with both team requirements and organizational objectives. Nurturing one’s development and well-being facilitates an empathetic and clear approach to decision-making.

Cultivating Autonomy and Responsibility:
In the context of servant leadership, the potential for engendering over-reliance amongst team members is a prevalent concern. Beyond mere empowerment and support, it is incumbent upon leaders to instill a sense of autonomy, responsibility, and reflective thinking within their teams. Maintaining a harmonious equilibrium between direction and independence catalyzes skill development and personal growth among team members.

Implementable Strategies for Balanced Leadership:
Leaders aspiring to achieve a balanced leadership style can incorporate the following strategies:

• Engage in Self-Reflection: Assess your leadership approach and identify whether you lean towards servant leadership. Reflect on how this style impacts team performance, personal well-being, and decision-making.
• Solicit Feedback: Actively seek feedback from colleagues and team members to understand the perceptions of your leadership style. This can highlight areas where self-balancing is essential.
• Adopt Diverse Approaches: Leadership is multifaceted and not a one-size-fits-all concept. Explore and amalgamate diverse leadership styles like transformational, situational, or authentic leadership to cater to the distinctive needs of your team and organizational ethos.
• Nurture Autonomy and Accountability: Build a culture that promotes self-reliance and accountability. Empower team members to own their responsibilities while extending the necessary guidance and support.​

​Hotspots for Leaders:

​Changing Team Members Based on Compatibility:
A leader's well-being is tied to a harmonious and productive team. Making changes for compatibility isn't self-serving, it's about building a team where everyone can flourish.
​
Prioritizing Personal Well-being:
Taking time for oneself isn't a sign of detachment but a necessity for rejuvenation. A balanced leader is more effective, which serves the team's best interests.

​​Holding Back Certain Information:
A whole leader understands that not everything can or should be disclosed. Transparency has its limits and respecting those boundaries is integral to effective leadership.

​Restructuring the Team Aligned with Leader Preferences:
A leader attuned to their own strengths and preferences is better equipped to build a team that aligns with organizational goals.

Allocating Resources Differently - Cutting Some Areas and Investing in Others:
A balanced leader makes data-driven decisions about resource allocation, considering both immediate needs and future goals.

​Stretching Team Capabilities When Necessary:
A whole leader knows when to push and when to pull back, balancing ambition with employee well-being. It’s about stretching the team for collective success, not just personal gain.

Adopting a Mixed Hierarchical Structure:
A flexible approach to hierarchy shows a leader who understands the need for different styles of governance in varying circumstances, supporting a more holistic leadership model.

​These are the things leaders may be criticised for, despite their motives. These hotspots therefore serve as practical examples of how a 'whole leader' applies a balanced outlook in making tough but necessary decisions. By doing so, they not only serve their team but also themselves, sustaining impact over the long term.

​​Conclusion:
In the ever-evolving professional landscape, recognizing and addressing the implicit cautions of servant leadership is imperative. By weaving self-balance and a multifaceted leadership approach that integrates individual development with a service focus, leaders can navigate inherent limitations and enhance their leadership effectiveness.
Leadership is an ongoing odyssey, necessitating continual reflection, adaptability, and exploration of diverse strategies. Let's abandon the notion that self-balance equates to selfishness and endorse it as a cornerstone of effective leadership.
Remember, the key to becoming a more effective leader is anchored in discovering your leadership equilibrium.

If refining your leadership balance resonates with you, please feel free to connect. Let's collaboratively navigate the nuances and opportunities intrinsic to contemporary leadership landscapes.

References:
Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). The Power of Servant-Leadership. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Spears, L. C. (2010). A Conceptual Clarity of Servant Leadership in Comparison to Other Value-Based Leadership Approaches. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(1), 37-50.
Dittmar, J. (2014). Exploring the Dark Side of Servant Leadership: Perspectives and Warnings. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 627-636.
Ramsey, D. (personal communication). Expert insights on leadership and personal finance.